Is the director not a worker?

Universal profits from the movies and shows written by people.

Some of these actors and directors do eventually amass a lot of wealth, but there’s a surprising number of even known actors/directors that are not that wealthy.

There are even more unknown actors in particular living in an apartment with 12 roommates in LA.

It’s kinda how the system works. Have thousands of lower tier actors trying to make it big and uplift a few to show it’s possible. Then they can cast “no-name” actors and extras for an unlivible wage because you have to do this type of work for the chance to make it

August 3rd is the last day the governor can call a special election. Otherwise it’s just combined with the general election.

I’m not sure if this is even that advantageous for the Republicans. Even during a special election a Republican will likely win, even if it’s a less Trumpy one, still a Republican. Seems better than an empty seat.

Unless they have reason to believe a dem would outperform in a special election.

Also since there has been confusion in other threads, Kentucky does not allow the governor to fill a vacant senate seat by appointments, he can only call a special election

At least 30 more years of unnecessary wars in the middle east

Nope didn’t say that at all, nice try though. You can be authoritarian and not bomb other countries and you can be authoritarian and bomb other countries.

Foreign affairs dont necessarily effect that determination.

The US I’d say is authoritarian and imperialist.

A country like Saudia Arabia or North Korea is just Authoritarian and tend to at least only meddle with boarding nations.

That’s cool and all but still irrelevant to the original point. You can be authoritarian to your own citizens domestically without invading other nations.

The US is both imperialist and authoritarian.

Look up the definition of authoritarianism. Bombing other countries is not the defining feature of an authoritarian government.