I don’t know, it looks like the amount of issues is way higher than improvement in comfort. Beside, they mentioned a lot of corner cases that would definitely show up and become a problem
I’ve been using C++ for quite some time, and it also had some talks about having named parameters, but it only helps in some places and hinders in most, imo. I feel like in Rust you may use a struct as parameter containing all of function parameteres where you really want the names
YES!
Is this the 5 minute argument?
Well it WAS the 5 second argument.
Is it when you pick up an argument someone dropped?
I don’t know, it looks like the amount of issues is way higher than improvement in comfort. Beside, they mentioned a lot of corner cases that would definitely show up and become a problem
I’ve been using C++ for quite some time, and it also had some talks about having named parameters, but it only helps in some places and hinders in most, imo. I feel like in Rust you may use a struct as parameter containing all of function parameteres where you really want the names
Maybe