ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 5 days agoremember what you're fighting forlemmy.mlimagemessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up1280
arrow-up1280imageremember what you're fighting forlemmy.mlComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square49linkfedilink
minus-squareKumikommunism [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 days agoI’m sorry, is that supposed to be a comparison of something that’s bad? Can you describe what’s bad about it?
minus-squarePissed@lemmy.mldeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·edit-23 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareKumikommunism [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 days agoI mean the single cosmetic ad is a problem and I think ads should be illegal, but all of the other signs are attached to their buildings, rather than being an advertisement. So if you’re talking about those, it is not the same. With the exception of the one, maybe.
minus-squarePissed@lemmy.mldeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-23 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareaxont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 days agoI would gladly accept 10x the amount of visible advertising if it meant I got even a fraction of the infrastructure of a typical large Chinese city
I’m sorry, is that supposed to be a comparison of something that’s bad? Can you describe what’s bad about it?
deleted by creator
I mean the single cosmetic ad is a problem and I think ads should be illegal, but all of the other signs are attached to their buildings, rather than being an advertisement. So if you’re talking about those, it is not the same.
With the exception of the one, maybe.
deleted by creator
I would gladly accept 10x the amount of visible advertising if it meant I got even a fraction of the infrastructure of a typical large Chinese city