Maybe, but this is a very good article.

The risk is not in the visible code, but in the invisible training data, the alignment protocols, and the potential for future remote manipulation or data harvesting via associated cloud services.

Would that be good? I would clearly say ‘no’, the term ‘open source’ alone is offensively misinterpreted by the way the Chinese government is using it here. What China is doing here has nothing to do with open source. I hope Europe goes a different path with Mistral and other projects.

No, but your comment is whataboutism.