• Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is not snark, I am actually asking here, because I clearly am missing something.

        What does Israel and Ukraine have in common?

        • ghost_laptop@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          41
          ·
          1 month ago

          taiwan is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie literally funded by the us. south korea is occupied land by the us after they lost the war. israel is a nazi state sustained in its current form for the purpose of genociding the entire middle east. ukraine is a puppet state that has been receiving cia funding, military training, and equipment with the only purpose of destabilizing russia. so essentially they’re all varying degrees of us imperialism in different shades.

        • EmmiLime@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          30 days ago

          They’re all vassal states of the US empire. The US controls them and in south Korea’s case their army is commanded by an Amerikan.

          Their only goals are to project their empire’s power and encircle Russia and China. Japan is also a vassal state the same way.

            • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              29 days ago

              This might be the worst attempt at a rebuttal Ive ever seen. They got it from knowing about the countries the flags represent.

              • Geobloke@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                29 days ago

                I think you mean your buttal. Also how did you think my original comment was not taking the piss?

                • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  Oh boy, you really need to be walked thru the steps, huh? I’ll try to spell it out for you: Making a mockery out of the other persons argument is a form of rebuttal. Your attempt at mockery was piss-poor.

                  If you want to improve yourself consider practicing by moving beyond the simple “I know what you are, what am I” you’ve attempted in this response.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I believe, jankforlife just believes in pissing off as many people as possible…

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 month ago

        it’ll only piss you off if you believe in the epstein class’ propaganda.

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          These nations comprise more than 100 million people. Even if the Epstein class personally impregnated 100 million children to deliver the population, the countries would still have basic legitimacy, because they contain these people.

          If you’re about to hit me with your definition of these countries just being the respective governments, not the people within, then you are using a definition outside the norm and should not be surprised that you piss people off, no matter what propaganda you want to believe in.

          • znonymous [comrade/them, love/loves]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            1 month ago

            Names of countries and borders around people change all the time. They are in perpetual flux.

            The countries change, yet the people within them are the same, across that change.

            If you think states or nations are inextricably linked to their people, your definitional “norm” is probably some form of propaganda, and has little to do with historical reality. Or, maybe you are a goldfish.

              • LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                21
                ·
                1 month ago

                Is your point that you’re immune to reason?

                Regardless, no, your own inability to comprehend the distinction between a population and a state is not a failure that most other people share. It’s actually easy and commonplace for human beings to recognize that they are not in fact identical to the entity that governs them. I’m sure even you are actually capable of it too, since even the most diehard fanatical nationalist doesn’t unquestioningly agree with everything their state does or mistake themselves for their government when they look in a mirror, or mistake their state for themselves when they see a flag in a meme.

                Sure some people identify with their state, but none of them identify as their state, the way you’re trying to make out as if they do with your weird impregnation analogy.

                But I get it, it’s rhetorically handy to be able to preemptively discredit the most obvious counter to your argument by stating a falsehood about it and then pretending what you said is “the norm.” That way you don’t have to account for that pesky reality getting in the way of the point you’re trying to make.

                The absurdity of your claim also becomes apparent as soon as it’s pointed out that there are significant numbers of people within each of those countries (excepting maybe “Israel”) who would fullheartedly agree with the OP image and affirm the illegitimacy of the state that rules over them.

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            it’s about who controls them right now.

            without the united states empire taiwan, south korea, and isreal would not exist as countries and ukraine wouldn’t be controlled by fascists.

          • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            30 days ago

            the countries would still have basic legitimacy, because they contain these people.

            Do you believe in the basic legitimacy of the DPRK, sometimes called “North Korea”?

          • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            29 days ago

            All countries have people in the lol. What are you even trying to argue here? There’s plenty of peoples with unrecognised countries. There’s plenty of countries with contested territory and people in the contested territory. There’s plenty of countries with people who don’t consider their country “legitimate” and countries with people who consider separatist movements in their country “illegitimate”. Is your basis for legitimacy wether a country has people and a wikipedia page or what are you trying to get at here?