My browser says (in F12 console of firefox):

SyntaxError client.js:2:1170023
    hw https://лемми.опенсорс.рус/static/0799f19b/js/client.js:2

the file starts with

/*! For license information please see client.js.LICENSE.txt */
(()=>{var e,t,n,r,o={45850:(e,t,n)=>{"use strict";n.d(t,

and DeepSeek says that e,t,n,r,o should be separated by spaces, i.e. e, t, n, r, o

The lemmy.ml instance adds that image without problems.

  • Artwork@lemmy.world
    1·
    2 months ago

    I would start by deploying non-minified scripts, and with the error/exception thown, set breakpoint in the previous stacktrace step. Then, reload/repeat, and follow the logic step by step until the exception stage.

    • aaryOPAРусский
      1·
      2 months ago

      It’s a bit illogical. I have exactly the same version as lemmy.ml. But their instance works, and mine - doesn’t.

      BE: 0.19.19

        • aaryOPAРусский
          2·
          2 months ago

          I don’t know is it related or not. I have only one container instead of two, and I use Firefox instead of Chromium. Theoretically it’s possible that there is no enough access rights for images data volume, but I didn’t checked that yet (and in this case the error message is not clear and helpfull).

          • Artwork@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            1 month ago

            Yes, indeed! Please do check out the volume (bind-)mount permissions of the container.
            Weird, that someone unknown downvoted our messages. Perhaps, the person has life issues, unfortunately…

            • aaryOPAРусский
              2·
              1 month ago

              the problem was in reverse proxy settings. but during the reconfiguration process i also switched the setup from files to minio and from sled (pict-rs relies on an embedded key-value store called sled to store metadata) to postgres

              • Artwork@lemmy.world
                1·
                1 month ago

                It works! Hurray! Hurray! Awesomely done!
                Thank you for the response!

                Just in case, though the project is great, Minio is known to have issues in management, unfortunately.
                Please check the following:
                - https://redd.it/1pd97nq (It seems the project has come to an abrupt halt…) [2025-12-03]

                Have you considered the time-verified Redis for key/value storage?

                • aaryOPA
                  2·
                  1 month ago

                  Have you considered the time-verified Redis for key/value storage?

                  I prefer to keep the setup as it is now. But if I will need k/v storage next time, I will use something else. And then, when it will be time to upgrade, i will migrate from minio to next choice. Or, just drop this setup and create a new one.